Arguments for Eminent Domain

Seriously, which is more practical—a few homes’ towel closets or one Linens & Things Superstore?
Seizing property for “public use” overturns decades of misanthropic homeowners refusing entry to absolute strangers.
Upward mobility and entertainment for all as state governments can now reclassify “blighted area” to mean “currently without a sports complex.”
Dissenting opinion that by expanding the definition of eminent domain a “spectre of condemnation hangs over all property” easily countered by fact that homeowners have had more than enough time to plant gardens to attract tourists and negate the need for seizure.
Developers ability to lowball offers to mandatory sellers means goodbye to lengthy and oft-tedious bidding process.
Allows town to update scruffy historic district with spiffy parking facility for Best Buy.













2 Comments:
Government has an obligation to protect its constituency from the horrors of Ikea.
I'm not worried: in the middle of the night I plan on using a bulldozer to knock down my neighbors' houses in a three-block radius, then I'm going to paint my house bright orange and put up a sign saying "Home Depot" on it.
Then when people show up asking where the springe fitters or magnetic cattle-drags are, I'll just point my thumb over my shoulder, say "aisle 397, two miles west," and they'll go away.
Post a Comment
<< Home